Problem updating java rawlings baseball dating
And any improvements they make in their software will be available in their products wherever they are sold, simply because it makes no sense to maintain two different versions of the software. Governments will get involved in the Io T, because the risks are too great and the stakes are too high.
This is truly an area where the actions of a few countries can drive worldwide change. Computers are now able to affect our world in a direct and physical manner. A small-government Republican president created the Department of Homeland Security in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks: a rushed and ill-thought-out decision that we've been trying to fix for more than a decade.
There is no market solution because the insecurity primarily affects other people. And, like pollution, the only solution is to regulate.
The details would need to be carefully scoped, but either of these options would raise the cost of insecurity and give companies incentives to spend money making their devices secure. But the main costs in making software come from development.
It's true that this is a domestic solution to an international problem and that there's no U. regulation that will affect, say, an Asian-made product sold in South America, even though that product could still be used to take down U. If the United States and perhaps a few other major markets implement strong Internet-security regulations on Io T devices, manufacturers will be forced to upgrade their security if they want to sell to those markets.
The government could impose minimum security standards on Io T manufacturers, forcing them to make their devices secure even though their customers don't care.
They could impose liabilities on manufacturers, allowing companies like Dyn to sue them if their devices are used in DDo S attacks.
Search for problem updating java:
We don't know who perpetrated that attack, but it could have easily been a lone hacker.